Skip to main content

LR: film industry assessment

1) MARK: 7/15 GRADE:D

WWW: Q3 shows a strong opinion and real agreement with the debate. This demonstrates the potential you have in media!

EBI: Lacking key knowledge- film regulation. This is the inevitable consequence of not completing the work we set. Lack of depth/ detail and specific reference to the CSP (Chicken). You needed a lot more for Q3 in particular... you didn't address the other side of the debate (funding, commercial success).

2)Q1: 1/2
Q2: 2/4
Q3: 4/9

3)Film festival circuit.

4)It is not important for the BFI to focus on social-realist films as they are low budget; meaning that they are wasting their money on small films which probably won't get much recognition. They should be focusing on the big Hollywood films which will draw in a much bigger audience therefore, they won't be wasting their money.

5) It is important that the BFI to make social-realist films as they contain topics that are considered as sensitive therefore, they are unspoken of. It shows people the negative lives that some people live. Usually they focus on what is going on in someone's life and the way they live with a certain situation. Predominantly, all of the social-realism films include a message to the audience in order to create a sense of social awareness.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

TV index

1) Introduction to TV Drama 2) Capital: Case study 3) Capital: Marxism and Hegemony 4) Capital: Applying Marxism 5) Deutschland 83: Case study 6) Deutschland 83: Close-textual analysis notes 7) Deutschland 83: Postmodernism 8) Industries: The rise of foreign-language TV dramas 9) Industries: The impact of new/digital media on television 10) TV: 750-word exam question
Post a Comment
Read more

CASE STUDY: capital

REVIEWS AND FEATURES: 1)POSITIVE POINTS- -"a complicated and brilliant portrait of London life" The Guardian. -"strong performances from a superb ensemble cast" The Telegraph. -"its far more gripping than a drama about the property market sounds" Evening Standard. 2)CRITICISMS- -"an overly schematic tangle of under developed plot lines populated by underwritten characters" The Telegraph. -"it was a disappointment" The Telegraph. 3) 4)The writer says that 'the average house price in London hits £500,000 as Capital's housing market shows no sign of losing steam'. 5)-"housing market and increasing rate of gentrification across London means that Capital's ideas still stand. Reflecting the times, the setting has changed from Clapham to Balham." Standard. -"Capital offers a microcosmic metaphor for London at large." Standard. -"This drama shows an eternal London, riven by inequality and...
Post a Comment
Read more

CHICKEN- case study

Funding: 1) The budget for chicken was £110,000. 2)Stephenson raised money through investment by individuals; could be rich friends or contacts. 3)The budget is much lower than a popular film as it used less equipment and scences therefore it was cheaper to film unlike an expensive film to make. 4)The BFI Film Fund uses National Lottery funds in order to develop and support original UK filmmakers and films and to increase the audiences. 5)I think that 'Chicken' failed to secure funding from the BFI Film Fund as the topics within the film could potentially make the audience feel uncomfortable therefore, they wouldn't make much money from it. Production: 1)The weather made it difficult to film as most of the shots were filmed outside. 2)The film took 19 days to shoot. 3)The most difficult shots to film were the outside shots. Distribution: 1)In 2014, the film failed to secure a distribution deal due to the BFI not funding the film; it suggested that the film woul...
Post a Comment
Read more